Old argument of “Terrorists” and “facial recognition surveillance”

Ive gotten into a little friendly disscusion on the use of facial surveillance cameras being used by the government to catch criminals (which is getting voted on to become more relevant). Although i agree it could be well used for that it seems unnecessary to place them everywhere, you feel watched every move you make, get recorded every step you take.

But what is an argument i could ponder about , that “counters” the criminal catching argument(which i agree with …

argument cameras catch criminals facial facial recognition government old privacy recognition relevant surveillance surveillance cameras terrorists