Dec. 22, 2022, 2:10 a.m. | Joshua Bundt, Andrew Fasano, Brendan Dolan-Gavitt, William Robertson, Tim Leek

cs.CR updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org

Fuzz testing is often automated, but also frequently augmented by experts who
insert themselves into the workflow in a greedy search for bugs. In this paper,
we propose Homo in Machina, or HM-fuzzing, in which analyses guide the manual
efforts, maximizing benefit. As one example of this paradigm, we introduce
compartment analysis. Compartment analysis uses a whole-program dominator
analysis to estimate the utility of reaching new code, and combines this with a
dynamic analysis indicating drastically under-covered edges guarding that …

analysis fuzz fuzz testing testing

SOC 2 Manager, Audit and Certification

@ Deloitte | US and CA Multiple Locations

Information Security Engineers

@ D. E. Shaw Research | New York City

KDN IAM Associate Consultant

@ KPMG India | Hyderabad, Telangana, India

Staff Test and Evaluation Engineer - Electronic Warfare

@ Anduril | Costa Mesa, California, United States

Junior Project Cybersecurity Manager

@ NXP Semiconductors | Bucharest

Embedded PSOC Analyst

@ Sibylline Ltd | London, United Kingdom