Nov. 23, 2022, 2:20 a.m. | Stephen Casper, Kaivalya Hariharan, Dylan Hadfield-Menell

cs.CR updates on arXiv.org arxiv.org

Deep neural networks (DNNs) are powerful, but they can make mistakes that
pose significant risks. A model performing well on a test set does not imply
safety in deployment, so it is important to have additional tools to understand
its flaws. Adversarial examples can help reveal weaknesses, but they are often
difficult for a human to interpret or draw generalizable, actionable
conclusions from. Some previous works have addressed this by studying
human-interpretable attacks. We build on these with three contributions. …

attacks automated copy networks neural networks paste

SOC 2 Manager, Audit and Certification

@ Deloitte | US and CA Multiple Locations

EY GDS Internship Program - SAP, Cyber, IT Consultant or Finance Talents with German language

@ EY | Wrocław, DS, PL, 50-086

Security Architect - 100% Remote (REF1604S)

@ Citizant | Chantilly, VA, United States

Network Security Engineer - Firewall admin (f/m/d)

@ Deutsche Börse | Prague, CZ

Junior Cyber Solutions Consultant

@ Dionach | Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom

Senior Software Engineer (Cryptography), Bitkey

@ Block | New York City, United States