War, Hunh. Yeah. What is it Good For? Reducing Insurer Liability for Cyberattacks

A New Jersey court recently ruled that an insurer was not relieved from its obligation to pay for Merck’s losses after a Russian NotPetya cyberattack. The insurer claimed its ‘Act of War’ exclusion applied to the company’s cyberinsurance policy; the court disagreed. The rise of cyberattacks has led to a significant increase in the demand..

The post War, Hunh. Yeah. What is it Good For? Reducing Insurer Liability for Cyberattacks appeared first on Security Boulevard.

act act of war court cyberattack cyberattacks cyberinsurance cyberlaw cybersecurity data security featured governance incident response insurer liability losses malware merck new jersey notpetya pay policy ransomware risk & compliance russian security boulevard (original) spotlight the company war what is