April 25, 2023, 1:10 a.m. | MalBot

Malware Analysis, News and Indicators - Latest topics malware.news

From the first two articles (here, and here) on this topic arises the obvious question…so what? Not
validating findings has worked well for many, to the point that the lack of validation is not recognized. After all, who notices that findings were not verified? The peer review process? The manager? The customer? Given just the fact how pervasive training materials and processes are that focus solely on single artifacts in isolation should give us a clear understanding …

articles customer fact findings focus iii isolation manager point practice process processes question review single training understanding validation verified

CyberSOC Technical Lead

@ Integrity360 | Sandyford, Dublin, Ireland

Cyber Security Strategy Consultant

@ Capco | New York City

Cyber Security Senior Consultant

@ Capco | Chicago, IL

Sr. Product Manager

@ MixMode | Remote, US

Security Compliance Strategist

@ Grab | Petaling Jaya, Malaysia

Cloud Security Architect, Lead

@ Booz Allen Hamilton | USA, VA, McLean (1500 Tysons McLean Dr)